<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HUNDLEY LAW GROUP &#187; sanctions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hundleylaw.com/tag/sanctions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hundleylaw.com</link>
	<description>Trial and Appellate Litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:55:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New v. Pace Suburban Bus Service</title>
		<link>http://www.hundleylaw.com/2010/02/new-v-pace-suburban-bus-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hundleylaw.com/2010/02/new-v-pace-suburban-bus-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HLG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law Notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Appellate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1st Dist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instructions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jnov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 219]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hundleylaw.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New v. Pace Suburban Bus Service, Nos. 1-08-3605 &#38; 1-08-3606 (January 27, 2010). Although plaintiff’s counsel was denied j.n.o.v. following a defense verdict, the appellate court upheld Rule 219 discovery sanctions of $17,000 for plaintiff&#8217;s counsel&#8217;s attorney&#8217;s fees and costs relating to deposition of defense medical expert who &#8220;resigned&#8221; after deposition, as defendant had prior knowledge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://eservices.isba.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=3739&amp;e=OTIzNzU1Mg==&amp;l=-http--www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2010/1stDistrict/January/1083605.pdf">New v. Pace Suburban Bus Service</a>, Nos. 1-08-3605 &amp; 1-08-3606 (January 27, 2010). Although plaintiff’s counsel was denied j.n.o.v. following a defense verdict, the appellate court upheld Rule 219 discovery sanctions of $17,000 for plaintiff&#8217;s counsel&#8217;s attorney&#8217;s fees and costs relating to deposition of defense medical expert who &#8220;resigned&#8221; after deposition, as defendant had prior knowledge that expert was refusing to respond to deposition subpoena for his tax records and could have been withdrawn prior to deposition.</p>
<p>The court also found proper the use of both common carrier and ordinary driver jury instructions as to negligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hundleylaw.com/2010/02/new-v-pace-suburban-bus-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

