<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HUNDLEY LAW GROUP &#187; remittitur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hundleylaw.com/tag/remittitur/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hundleylaw.com</link>
	<description>Trial and Appellate Litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:55:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Martinez v. Elias, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.hundleylaw.com/2010/02/martinez-v-elias-m-d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hundleylaw.com/2010/02/martinez-v-elias-m-d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HLG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law Notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Appellate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1st Dist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[med mal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motions in limine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remittitur]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hundleylaw.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Martinez v. Elias, M.D., No. 1-08-0265 (December 28, 2009). Court properly denied motion in limine to bar evidence of financial motive to perform surgery, which plaintiff claimed was unnecessarily performed by defendant orthopedic surgeon, therefore deviating from the standard of care. Motion for new trial was denied, but the court reversed a remittitur for $100,000 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2009/1stDistrict/December/1080265.pdf">Martinez v. Elias, M.D.</a>, No. 1-08-0265 (December 28, 2009). Court properly denied motion in limine to bar evidence of financial motive to perform surgery, which plaintiff claimed was unnecessarily performed by defendant orthopedic surgeon, therefore deviating from the standard of care. Motion for new trial was denied, but the court reversed a remittitur for $100,000 because the testimony was sufficient to support jury&#8217;s award of $100,000 for non-itemized future medical expenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hundleylaw.com/2010/02/martinez-v-elias-m-d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

